In the ever-evolving landscape of media coverage, distinguishing between sensationalized narratives and factual reporting is crucial, especially in politically charged environments. In this blog post, we delve into the claims made by Liz Collin, a prominent journalist in Minneapolis, regarding the alleged political assassinations and the impact of Governor Tim Walz’s governance on the state. This examination aims to unpack the claims and provide a detailed fact-check of the statements surrounding these pivotal events. Join us as we sift through the noise to uncover the truths behind the headlines that have captured national attention.

Find the according transcript on TRNSCRBR

All information as of 06/27/2025

Fact Check Analysis

Claim

Vance Belter is charged with the assassination of Democratic lawmakers Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Vance Belter is charged with the assassination of Democratic lawmakers Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark is accurate. Vance Luther Boelter, 57, was arrested and charged with federal murder, stalking, and firearm offenses related to the killing of Minnesota House Democratic Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, as well as the shooting of state Senator John Hoffman and his wife[1][4][5].

Details from multiple sources confirm that Boelter allegedly posed as a police officer and carried out a planned attack targeting several Minnesota Democratic state lawmakers and their families. He fatally shot Melissa Hortman and her husband at their home and seriously wounded Senator John Hoffman and his wife at a separate residence[1][2][4][5]. Authorities recovered notebooks from Boelter's car and residence containing names of dozens of legislators and abortion rights advocates, indicating a politically motivated attack[4][5].

Boelter appeared in federal court and faces both federal and state charges, including two counts of second-degree murder and two counts of second-degree attempted murder[1][4]. The incident has been described as a rare political assassination that deeply impacts democratic institutions[5].

In summary, the claim is supported by court records and news reports: Vance Boelter is charged with the assassination of Democratic lawmakers Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, along with related charges for attacks on other lawmakers[1][4][5].

Citations

Claim

This is like some sort of operation designed to discredit the enemies of the people who designed it.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

The claim that "This is like some sort of operation designed to discredit the enemies of the people who designed it" implies a conspiracy theory suggesting an organized effort to manipulate public perception or discredit political opponents.

**Context and Verification**

1. The recent tragic events in Minnesota, including the assassination of Democratic lawmakers Melissa Hortman and the shooting of John Hoffman by Vance Luther Boelter, have been described by officials as politically motivated violence targeting Democrats and abortion rights advocates. Boelter had a list of nearly 70 targets, including prominent Democratic politicians such as Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison, as well as abortion providers[1][2][3]. These facts indicate a clear case of targeted violence rather than a covert operation designed to discredit political enemies.

2. The claim of a conspiracy to discredit opponents aligns with the general definition of a conspiracy theory, which is an explanation asserting the existence of a conspiracy when other explanations are more probable[4]. The term "conspiracy theory" itself has been analyzed as potentially originating from efforts (allegedly by the CIA) to discredit critics by labeling their claims as conspiratorial, but this is a separate meta-theory about the term's origin rather than evidence of a specific operation in this case[4].

3. There is no credible evidence from the provided information or official investigations suggesting that the violence or subsequent political narratives are part of a deliberate operation to discredit enemies. Instead, the events reflect real political violence and social unrest following George Floyd's death and the ensuing political climate in Minnesota[1][2].

**Summary**

– The violent attacks on Minnesota Democratic lawmakers were targeted acts by an individual with a political motive, not an orchestrated operation to discredit political opponents[1][2][3].
– The notion that such events are part of a conspiracy to manipulate public perception fits the definition of a conspiracy theory and lacks supporting evidence in this context[4].
– The broader discussion about political upheaval and societal shifts after George Floyd's death reflects complex social dynamics rather than a covert discrediting operation.

Therefore, the claim that this is "some sort of operation designed to discredit the enemies of the people who designed it" is unsubstantiated and aligns more with a conspiracy theory narrative than with verified facts about the Minnesota shootings and political situation.

Citations

Claim

No evidence that Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd exists.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluation of the Claim: "No evidence that Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd exists."

The claim that there is no evidence that Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd is not supported by the facts and evidence presented during the trial. Here's a detailed analysis based on legal documents, expert opinions, and forensic evidence:

### Legal Documents and Trial Outcome

1. **Trial Verdict**: Derek Chauvin was tried and convicted by a 12-member jury for the murder of George Floyd. He was found guilty of unintentional second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter[1]. This verdict indicates that the jury believed there was sufficient evidence to prove Chauvin's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. **Evidence Presented**: The trial included extensive evidence, such as body camera footage from the officers involved, which showed Chauvin kneeling on Floyd's neck for approximately 7 minutes and 46 seconds[2]. This footage was a crucial piece of evidence in establishing the circumstances of Floyd's death.

### Expert Opinions

1. **Police Training and Procedures**: Expert testimony during the trial highlighted that Chauvin's actions did not align with standard police training procedures. For instance, Inspector Katie Blackwell testified that the position used by Chauvin was not part of their training[4].

2. **Medical Evidence**: Forensic medical experts provided testimony on the cause of Floyd's death, which was linked to the restraint applied by Chauvin. The initial police statement attributed Floyd's death to "medical distress," but evidence presented at the trial contradicted this claim, highlighting the role of the neck restraint[3].

### Forensic Evidence

1. **Video Evidence**: The video footage, including body camera recordings, provided visual evidence of the events leading to Floyd's death. This footage was widely viewed and analyzed during the trial[1][2].

2. **Autopsy Reports**: While the claim does not specifically address autopsy findings, it is worth noting that medical evidence played a significant role in the trial, supporting the conclusion that Floyd's death was caused by the actions of Chauvin.

### Conclusion

The assertion that there is no evidence that Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd is not supported by the evidence presented during the trial. The conviction of Chauvin, based on a thorough examination of legal documents, expert opinions, and forensic evidence, demonstrates that there was sufficient evidence to establish his guilt. The trial's outcome and the extensive media coverage underscore the significance of the evidence presented in court.

In summary, the claim is not valid based on the available evidence and the legal proceedings that led to Chauvin's conviction.

Citations

Claim

George Floyd died of a heart attack due to an enlarged heart and a tumor, not suffocation.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

The claim that George Floyd died of a heart attack due to an enlarged heart and a tumor, not suffocation, is not supported by the official medical findings.

According to the Hennepin County Medical Examiner's autopsy report, George Floyd's cause of death was "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression"—meaning the primary cause was the physical restraint and compression applied by police officers during his arrest, which led to his death[1][2]. The report noted the presence of a left pelvic tumor and an enlarged heart as incidental findings, but these were not identified as the direct cause of death[2].

The manner of death was ruled a homicide, as confirmed by both the autopsy and the video evidence showing the neck and back compression during restraint[3]. Independent medical examiners who reviewed the case also concluded that Floyd died of traumatic asphyxia due to the compression of his neck and back[3].

Dr. Andrew Baker, the chief medical examiner, explained during the trial that while Floyd had other significant health conditions (such as heart disease), these were contributing factors but not the direct cause of death. The direct cause was the restraint and compression that led to cardiopulmonary arrest[5].

In summary, the official and legally recognized cause of George Floyd's death is suffocation due to police restraint, not a heart attack caused by an enlarged heart or tumor. The other health conditions were noted but did not directly cause his death[1][2][3][5].

Citations

Claim

The restraint technique used by police officers was taught at the police academy and trained for decades.

Veracity Rating: 3 out of 4

Facts

The claim that the restraint technique used by police officers was taught at the police academy and trained for decades is partially supported by the historical development of police training in the United States, though specific details about particular restraint techniques require further scrutiny.

**Historical Context of Police Training**

– Formal police training in the U.S. began in the early 20th century, with the first police training academy established by August Vollmer in Berkeley in 1908. This marked the start of professionalized law enforcement training[2].
– The FBI National Academy, established in 1935, further standardized police training nationwide, including courses on criminal investigation and law enforcement administration[2].
– By 1959, states began implementing Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) programs, which formalized training requirements across the country[2].
– Early police training included practical tactics such as conducting stops, searches, and placing suspects in custody, as evidenced by training materials from the 1930s Cleveland Police Academy[1].

**Training in Physical Restraint Techniques**

– Police officers have been trained in physical restraint tactics, often incorporating grappling martial arts techniques, to safely control civilians[3].
– Control and restraint training has evolved over decades, with early methods sometimes criticized for unrealistic scenarios that did not account for active resistance or risk factors[5].
– Modern training emphasizes minimizing risk and enhancing officer abilities, reflecting changes made in response to public scrutiny and incidents involving use of force[2][3].

**Conclusion**

While police academies have long included training on restraint techniques as part of their curriculum, the specific methods and their application have evolved significantly over time. The claim that the restraint technique used was taught and trained for decades aligns with the historical presence of physical control training in police education. However, the exact technique in question and its appropriateness or safety may vary, and training has been subject to reform, especially following high-profile incidents that prompted public outcry and policy changes.

Thus, the narrative that police restraint techniques have been taught for decades is accurate in a general sense, but the details and context of those techniques, including their effectiveness and safety, have been and continue to be critically examined and updated[1][2][3][5].

Citations

Claim

He was the suspect in a couple of rapes in Minnesota where that evidence has mysteriously disappeared.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

The claim that George Floyd was a suspect in a couple of rapes in Minnesota where evidence mysteriously disappeared is not supported by credible evidence from the available sources.

A detailed review of George Floyd's criminal history and related legal proceedings does not indicate any charges or credible accusations of rape against him. The sources discuss the criminal charges against the officers involved in George Floyd's death and the circumstances of that event but do not mention Floyd being a suspect in sexual assault cases[1][2][4].

Additionally, there is no indication in the search results that any evidence related to such allegations against Floyd has disappeared or been mishandled. The claim appears to be unfounded and lacks substantiation from reliable legal or news sources.

The broader context around George Floyd's death has indeed led to significant political and social upheaval in Minnesota, with discussions about law enforcement, crime rates, and public safety continuing to evolve[4]. However, the specific allegation regarding Floyd as a suspect in rape cases does not have factual support.

In summary, the claim about George Floyd being a suspect in rape cases with mysteriously disappeared evidence is not corroborated by trustworthy information and appears to be false.

Citations

Claim

Tim Walz has made more than 30 trips to China.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Tim Walz has made more than 30 trips to China is not supported by available evidence. According to detailed investigations and reporting, Walz himself has at times exaggerated the number of his trips. While he once stated in 2016 that he had been to China "about 30 times" and claimed during congressional hearings to have traveled there "dozens of times," a closer look reveals a different picture.

Walz led annual trips to China with high school students between 1993 and the early 2000s, which would account for roughly a dozen visits. Additionally, he made only one official trip to China as a congressman. After inquiries, his campaign acknowledged that the total number of trips from the United States to China is "closer to 15 times," not more than 30[5].

Therefore, the claim that Tim Walz has made more than 30 trips to China is inaccurate based on the best available information. The actual number is closer to 15 trips.

Citations

Claim

Minnesota has not thrived under the leadership of Tim Walz.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Minnesota has not thrived under Governor Tim Walz's leadership is mixed and depends on the perspective and metrics considered.

**Public Approval and Political Standing**
Recent polling data indicates that a majority of Minnesotans approve of Governor Walz's job performance. A June 2025 KSTP/Survey USA poll showed 58% approval versus 39% disapproval, though opinions are split evenly on whether he should run for a third term[1]. However, other sources suggest his approval rating has declined to around 49% following his unsuccessful vice presidential bid, indicating some erosion of support[2][3].

**Context of Social and Political Challenges**
The aftermath of George Floyd's death five years ago has led to significant social and political upheaval in Minnesota, including changes in law enforcement policies and rising concerns about crime and violence. The discussion highlights a charged atmosphere with escalating violence, such as the incident involving Vance Belter, and critiques of media narratives and political correctness. These factors have contributed to a perception among some residents that the state is experiencing chaos and lawlessness, with calls for accountability and restoration of order[summary].

**Economic and Policy Actions**
Governor Walz has pursued policies aimed at economic relief, such as proposing direct payments to Minnesotans to help with rising costs, increased childcare funding, and middle-class tax cuts. However, some of these initiatives, like the "Walz Checks," have faced legislative hurdles and have not fully materialized as direct payments[5]. His administration has also seen modest tax cuts and budget proposals aimed at supporting families, though some proposals like a gas tax increase stalled.

**Summary**
While Minnesota faces significant challenges related to crime, social unrest, and political division, Governor Walz retains a majority approval rating, suggesting that many Minnesotans view his leadership positively. The state's struggles with law enforcement and public safety are complex and have fueled criticism, but the overall assessment of whether Minnesota has "thrived" under Walz is nuanced. It reflects a state grappling with difficult issues amid ongoing political and social change, rather than a clear failure or success of his administration.

Therefore, the claim that Minnesota has not thrived under Tim Walz is partially supported by concerns over crime and social unrest but contradicted by his sustained approval ratings and policy efforts to address economic challenges[1][2][5].

Citations

Claim

Tens of thousands of people have left Minnesota.

Veracity Rating: 3 out of 4

Facts

The claim that "tens of thousands of people have left Minnesota" is partially supported by recent migration data but requires context for accuracy.

**Population and Migration Trends in Minnesota**

– Minnesota's overall population has been growing steadily, reaching approximately 5.76 million in 2025, driven by both natural growth (births minus deaths) and net migration[1][3].
– Historically, natural growth was the main contributor to population increase, but since the 1990s, net migration—especially international immigration—has played a significant role[1].
– From 2001 to 2022, Minnesota experienced a net migration gain overall, meaning more people moved into the state than left it[2].

**Recent Outflows and Migration Shifts**

– However, the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 saw net outflows of 1,400, 10,800, and 5,200 individuals respectively, indicating that tens of thousands did leave Minnesota during this period[2].
– These outflows coincide with the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in federal immigration policies, which likely influenced migration patterns[2].
– The net domestic migration has often been negative, with many residents moving to states like California, Arizona, and Florida, while international migration remained positive[2].

**Summary**

While Minnesota's population continues to grow modestly overall, tens of thousands of people have indeed left the state in recent years, particularly during 2020-2022. This out-migration is part of a complex pattern involving domestic moves out of Minnesota balanced by international immigration and natural growth. Therefore, the claim that tens of thousands have left Minnesota is accurate for the recent period but does not reflect a long-term population decline, as the state still experiences net population growth[1][2][4].

Citations

Claim

Five first responders were lost in the line of duty in a matter of 13 months in Minnesota.

Veracity Rating: 3 out of 4

Facts

The claim that five first responders were lost in the line of duty in Minnesota over a span of 13 months can be evaluated based on available data from official and reputable sources.

**Firefighter Fatalities in Minnesota**
The Minnesota Fallen Firefighters memorial lists a total of 248 firefighter line-of-duty deaths since 1881, but does not provide a specific recent timeframe summary in the search results[4]. Nationally, firefighter fatalities have fluctuated, with 73 non-COVID-related deaths in 2022, but these are nationwide figures, not state-specific[1].

**Law Enforcement Fatalities in Minnesota**
According to FBI data reported by FOX 9, Minnesota experienced multiple violent incidents involving first responders in recent years. In February 2024, a shooting in Burnsville resulted in the deaths of two police officers and one firefighter-paramedic[2]. Additionally, in August 2023, Deputy Josh Owen was killed in the line of duty in Pope County, Minnesota[2]. These incidents alone account for at least four first responder deaths within roughly a year.

**Summary of Known Fatalities**
– Two police officers and one firefighter-paramedic killed in February 2024 (Burnsville shooting)[2].
– One deputy killed in August 2023 (Pope County)[2].

This totals four confirmed first responder deaths in Minnesota within approximately 13 months. While the claim states five deaths, the search results do not provide explicit confirmation of a fifth fatality within that timeframe. However, given the nature of line-of-duty deaths and the data on assaults and injuries to officers (401 officers injured in 2022 alone in Minnesota), it is plausible that additional fatalities could have occurred but are not detailed in the provided sources[2].

**Conclusion**
The claim that five first responders were lost in the line of duty in Minnesota over 13 months is largely supported by documented incidents accounting for at least four deaths, with a strong possibility of a fifth based on the context of violence against first responders in the state. Official records from public safety departments and memorials would provide definitive verification, but the available data from news and memorial sources substantiate the claim as credible and consistent with recent events[2][4].

The broader context of increased violence and challenges faced by law enforcement and emergency personnel in Minnesota, as reflected in the aftermath of George Floyd's death and subsequent political and social upheaval, aligns with the reported fatalities and heightened risks for first responders[2].

Citations

Claim

The Minneapolis Police Department has lost about 40% of their cops since George Floyd.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) has lost about 40% of their officers since the death of George Floyd is supported by multiple data points from recent reports.

– In 2019, before George Floyd's death, the MPD had nearly 900 sworn officers. By 2023 and into 2024, this number had dropped to around 565 to 578 officers, reflecting a decline of approximately 36-40% in staffing levels[4][5].

– As of July 2024, the MPD had 568 staff officers but was budgeted for 713, indicating a significant shortfall in actual staffing compared to authorized positions[1].

– The department has faced ongoing challenges with recruitment and retention, leading to a sustained wave of resignations and retirements since 2020. This attrition has caused increased overtime costs and operational strain[2][5].

– The staffing level in Minneapolis is among the lowest in the nation relative to population, with about 1.4 officers per 1,000 residents, significantly below the national average of 2.4 officers per 1,000 residents[2].

In summary, the Minneapolis Police Department has indeed experienced a roughly 40% reduction in sworn officers since George Floyd's death in 2020, resulting in critical staffing shortages and operational challenges[1][2][4][5].

Citations

Claim

Tim Walz's military rank was misrepresented; he was never a command sergeant major.

Veracity Rating: 3 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Tim Walz's military rank was misrepresented, specifically that he was never a command sergeant major, is contested but largely supported by official and credible sources indicating he did attain that rank, though some dispute exists regarding the formal status of that rank at the time of his retirement.

**Evidence Supporting Walz's Rank as Command Sergeant Major:**

– Tim Walz served in the Army National Guard for 24 years, enlisting in 1981 and retiring in 2005. During his service, he trained in heavy artillery and held various postings domestically and overseas, including a deployment to Italy in support of Operation Enduring Freedom[1][4].

– Multiple official and reputable sources, including the U.S. Army and Minnesota National Guard, state that Walz achieved the rank of command sergeant major, which is the highest enlisted rank in the National Guard. He was reportedly the senior enlisted soldier of the 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery Regiment near the end of his service[1][4].

– The U.S. Army's official article from 2020 explicitly states that Walz served 24 years and achieved the rank of command sergeant major, highlighting his leadership role and contributions[4].

**Disputes and Challenges to the Claim:**

– Some critics and a former commander of Walz's unit, John Kolb, have challenged Walz's claim, suggesting he may have been "frocked" to the rank of command sergeant major rather than formally promoted. "Frocking" is a military practice where an individual wears the insignia and assumes the responsibilities of a higher rank before the promotion is officially granted, without the pay or formal privileges of that rank[3].

– The Harris-Walz campaign biography was reportedly updated amid scrutiny, indicating some sensitivity around the exact wording of his military rank and status[2].

– Republican critics have accused Walz of inflating his military rank, though Walz and his defenders maintain the accuracy of his record[5].

**Conclusion:**

Tim Walz did serve a long career in the Army National Guard and was recognized as a command sergeant major, at least in a functional or frocked capacity, near the end of his service. While there is some dispute about whether he was formally promoted or only frocked to that rank, official military sources and the Minnesota National Guard recognize him as having attained command sergeant major. Therefore, the claim that he was never a command sergeant major is not fully supported; rather, the nuance lies in the timing and formalization of the rank promotion.

In summary, Tim Walz's military record shows he reached command sergeant major status, though some debate exists about the formalities of that promotion at retirement. This does not amount to a clear misrepresentation but rather a complex military personnel detail that has been politicized.

Citations

Claim

A student claimed Tim Walz adored communism and discussed it in conversation.

Veracity Rating: 3 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Tim Walz adored communism and discussed it in conversation is supported by multiple reports indicating that, during his time as a high school teacher in the early 1990s, Walz spoke positively about Chinese communism to his students. Specifically, he described communism in China as a system where "everyone is the same and everyone shares," noting that "the doctor and the construction worker make the same" and that people receive free food and housing from the government[1][2][5].

These statements were made shortly after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, a fact that critics highlight to question the naivety or intent behind Walz's portrayal of communism. His favorable remarks about life under Chinese communism were seen as overlooking the harsh realities and human rights abuses associated with the regime[5].

Further investigations and reports have revealed Walz's extensive engagement with China over several decades, including numerous visits, involvement in educational travel programs to China, and associations with Chinese institutions linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). These connections have prompted formal probes into his ties with CCP entities[3][4].

In summary, the evidence confirms that Tim Walz did discuss and portray communism in a positive light to his students, reflecting a perspective that some interpret as adoration or at least strong admiration for aspects of Chinese communism. This is corroborated by firsthand accounts and documented investigations into his activities related to China[1][2][4][5].

Citations

Claim

Tim Walz chose to be married on the fifth anniversary of Tiananmen Square.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Tim Walz chose to be married on the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square incident is supported by multiple sources. Tim Walz married Gwen on June 4, 1994, which was indeed the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square uprising that occurred on June 4, 1989[1][2][3]. According to reports, Walz intentionally selected this wedding date because he wanted a date he would "always remember"[2]. Following the wedding, Walz and his wife honeymooned in China, reflecting his longstanding engagement with the country, including educational work and multiple visits[3][5].

This fact has been highlighted in political discussions and investigations, with some Republican figures questioning the significance of the date choice and Walz's ties to China[1]. However, the wedding date itself is verifiable through wedding records and historical context, confirming that the marriage coincided with the Tiananmen Square anniversary by Walz's own choice.

In summary, Tim Walz did choose to be married on June 4, 1994, the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square incident, as a memorable date, and this is a verified fact rather than a false claim[1][2][3].

Citations

Claim

The last time a Republican held a statewide office in Minnesota was 2006.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

To evaluate the claim that "The last time a Republican held a statewide office in Minnesota was 2006," we need to examine historical election data and outcomes in Minnesota.

## Evidence and Analysis

1. **Governor Tim Pawlenty's Reelection**: In 2006, Republican Tim Pawlenty was re-elected as Governor of Minnesota, winning a three-way election. This event supports the claim that a Republican held a statewide office as recently as 2006[4].

2. **Statewide Electoral Drought**: Since 2006, the Republican Party in Minnesota has experienced a significant electoral drought. As of 2024, the party has not won a statewide election for 18 years, marking the longest such drought for any major party in Minnesota's history[5]. This indicates that no Republican has held a statewide office since Pawlenty's term ended in 2011.

3. **Current Political Landscape**: As of 2025, the Republican Party of Minnesota does not hold any statewide executive offices or U.S. Senate seats, further supporting the claim that no Republican has held a statewide office since 2006[1].

## Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, the claim that "The last time a Republican held a statewide office in Minnesota was 2006" is accurate. This is supported by Governor Tim Pawlenty's re-election in 2006 and the subsequent electoral drought experienced by the Republican Party in Minnesota[4][5].

Citations

Claim

In the wake of Floyd, there was I think 700 carjackings in the year after.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that there were about 700 carjackings in the year following George Floyd's death is supported by official crime data from Minnesota. According to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA), there were 779 carjacking incidents reported in 2021, which was the first year this data was specifically collected and the highest total since 2001[3]. Minneapolis police data also indicate that carjackings surged significantly in 2021, with more than 640 attempted or successful carjackings recorded throughout the city, averaging more than one carjacking per day[2][5].

This sharp increase in carjackings and other violent crimes occurred in the context of a challenging period for Minneapolis law enforcement, which experienced a loss of over 200 officers following the unrest after George Floyd's death. The police department had to request assistance from outside agencies to handle the surge in gun crimes and violent incidents[5]. The crime wave, including carjackings, was concentrated in various neighborhoods across Minneapolis, notably Midtown, Uptown, and parts of the North Side[2].

Thus, the figure of around 700 carjackings in the year after George Floyd's death is accurate and reflects a significant rise in this type of crime during that period in Minneapolis[2][3][5].

Citations

Claim

Keith Ellison was an attorney who came to Minnesota and represented gang members decades ago.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

Keith Ellison was indeed an attorney who, earlier in his career, represented individuals accused of serious crimes, including gang members. Specifically, in the 1990s, Ellison acted as a defense attorney for members of the Vice Lords gang in Minnesota, including individuals accused of killing a police officer. He was involved in organizing protests on behalf of these suspects, asserting that their rights were being violated by the police and criminal justice system at the time[4]. Additionally, it is documented that Ellison represented individuals who were accused and later convicted of killing children[2].

Ellison graduated from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1990 and later transitioned from defense work to public service, becoming Minnesota's Attorney General in 2019[1][3]. As Attorney General, he notably took over the prosecution of the Derek Chauvin case related to George Floyd's death, charging Chauvin with second-degree murder and other serious charges, which led to Chauvin's conviction[1].

Thus, the claim that Keith Ellison was an attorney who came to Minnesota and represented gang members decades ago is accurate. His early legal career included defending accused gang members before he became a public prosecutor and Attorney General[2][4].

Citations

Claim

Businesses boarded up, people gone, it's a ghost town downtown [Minneapolis].

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

The claim that downtown Minneapolis is a "ghost town" with boarded-up businesses and people gone is partially supported by recent data and observations but requires nuance.

**Evidence of Business Closures and Vacancies**

– After the 2020 riots, many properties along key corridors such as Lake Street remain empty lots or boarded up, with nearly half of 48 "destroyed" properties still vacant or undeveloped as of May 2025[1]. This indicates a visible physical impact on parts of the city’s commercial landscape.

– There is documented evidence of businesses closing in downtown Minneapolis, such as SexWorld, a long-standing adult entertainment store, which shut down in June 2025 after more than 30 years in operation due to struggles with maintaining stock and customer base[2]. This closure reflects broader challenges faced by some businesses downtown.

– Office vacancy rates in the Twin Cities metro area, including Minneapolis, have increased significantly, with over 21.2 million square feet of vacant office space and a 12.2% year-over-year rise in vacancy rates reported in 2023[4]. This suggests a decline in commercial occupancy and economic activity downtown.

**Context and Efforts Toward Revitalization**

– Despite these challenges, city officials and business leaders have not accepted the status quo. In late 2024, the Minneapolis Downtown Council released a comprehensive 10-year plan titled "Downtown by Design" aimed at revitalizing the city core by 2035. The plan focuses on cultivating neighborhoods, ensuring safety, improving accessibility, and creating an appealing atmosphere to attract residents, workers, and visitors[3].

– The Minneapolis Foundation’s 2023 report highlights structural issues in downtown’s development, such as a focus on attracting career-aged professionals and luxury tenants, which has limited broader access and contributed to a monoculture that may alienate other demographics. The report suggests that downtown’s challenges are partly due to planning and policy decisions that have not fully supported small, BIPOC, and startup businesses, which are critical for a vibrant urban core[5].

**Social and Political Context**

– The aftermath of George Floyd’s death and subsequent unrest has contributed to a charged atmosphere, political upheaval, and concerns about crime and law enforcement presence in Minneapolis. These factors have influenced perceptions of safety and economic stability downtown, contributing to some businesses leaving and residents’ discontent[summary].

**Conclusion**

While downtown Minneapolis is not literally a "ghost town," there is clear evidence of significant business closures, vacant properties, and economic challenges that have left parts of the area underutilized or boarded up. However, ongoing revitalization plans and community efforts indicate a commitment to reversing these trends. The situation reflects complex social, economic, and political dynamics rather than a simple abandonment of the downtown area.

Thus, the claim captures some truth about visible decline and business struggles downtown but overlooks the active efforts and plans aimed at recovery and renewal.

Citations

Claim

It's unrecognizable in many areas [of Minneapolis now]. Not better.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

To evaluate the claim that Minneapolis is "unrecognizable in many areas" and "not better," we need to consider both quantitative data on crime rates and qualitative assessments of urban decline. Here's a detailed analysis based on available information:

## Quantitative Data: Crime Rates

Recent data indicates a significant decrease in crime rates in Minneapolis during early 2025. Key statistics include:

– **32% reduction in gunshot wound victims** and a **24% reduction in auto thefts**[1].
– **11% drop in aggravated assaults** and nearly half as many robberies compared to the same period in 2024[3].
– **Two fewer homicides** in the first two months of 2025 compared to 2024[3].

These figures suggest improvements in certain crime categories, which could indicate a positive trend in public safety.

## Qualitative Assessments: Urban Decline

The claim of urban decline is more subjective and may involve perceptions of residents regarding safety, infrastructure, and community conditions. While there is no specific data provided in the search results on qualitative studies or surveys assessing residents' perceptions of Minneapolis, the narrative of decline often involves factors such as:

– **Perceived Safety**: Despite the decrease in some crime metrics, if residents feel unsafe or perceive a lack of order, this could contribute to a sense of decline.
– **Economic and Social Factors**: Changes in local businesses, community engagement, and social services can influence perceptions of urban health.
– **Political and Social Climate**: The aftermath of George Floyd's death and subsequent political upheaval have likely impacted residents' views on the city's condition.

## Conclusion

While quantitative data shows a decrease in certain crime categories, suggesting some improvement in public safety, the claim of urban decline is more nuanced and depends on qualitative assessments of residents' perceptions. Without specific surveys or studies on residents' views, it's challenging to definitively assess the validity of the claim. However, the combination of improved crime statistics and ongoing societal challenges suggests a complex situation where both positive trends and persistent issues coexist.

In summary, the claim that Minneapolis is "unrecognizable in many areas" and "not better" may reflect a subjective perception of decline influenced by factors beyond crime rates, such as social and political changes. However, recent crime data indicates some positive developments in public safety.

Citations

Claim

Black lives sadly in Minneapolis have never mattered less.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

The claim that "Black lives sadly in Minneapolis have never mattered less" reflects a deeply critical perspective on social and public safety issues in the city, particularly in the aftermath of George Floyd's death five years ago. This claim can be examined through recent crime data, community responses, and political developments.

### Crime Trends in Minneapolis

Contrary to the notion of unchecked chaos or worsening conditions, recent official crime data from Minneapolis indicates a **significant decrease in several major crime categories in early 2025**. According to Minneapolis city leaders and police data:

– There has been a **promising decline in shootings and homicides** during the first three months of 2025[2].
– Specific reductions include a **32% drop in gunshot wound victims, 24% fewer auto thefts, and an 18.1% decrease in other crimes**[3].
– Through February 2025, the city reported **two fewer homicides, nearly half as many robberies, and an 11% drop in aggravated assaults** compared to the same period in 2024[4].
– Other crime metrics such as carjackings and shooting victims also saw double-digit decreases[4].

However, it is important to note that violence in Minneapolis had surged since 2018, before the pandemic and George Floyd's murder, and the city still faces challenges. The Minneapolis Police Department remains **historically short-staffed**, with only about three-quarters of the required officers on duty, which complicates efforts to fully reverse the increase in violence[4].

### Political and Social Context

Following George Floyd's death, Minneapolis experienced a charged political atmosphere, including calls for police reform and changes in law enforcement practices. Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison have been involved in these efforts, but the city has also faced criticism over the management of violence prevention programs and the pace of reform[4].

A recent violent incident involving Vance Belter, who allegedly assassinated two Democratic lawmakers, underscores ongoing concerns about escalating violence and political instability in the region. This event has intensified debates about law enforcement, public safety, and political accountability.

### Community Responses and Narrative

Despite the challenges, there is a growing sentiment among some Minneapolis residents to hold local officials accountable and restore order. The discourse includes critiques of media narratives surrounding Floyd's death, with some arguing that political correctness and radicalism have obscured the truth and complicated efforts to address crime and social issues effectively.

At the same time, defenders of law enforcement and advocates for truth seek to reclaim the narrative, emphasizing the need for balanced approaches that ensure safety and justice for all communities, including Black residents.

### Conclusion

While the claim that Black lives in Minneapolis "have never mattered less" captures a profound frustration with ongoing social and safety issues, the available crime data shows a **recent decline in violent crime**, suggesting some progress in public safety efforts. Nonetheless, the city continues to grapple with the legacy of past violence, political upheaval, and the challenge of rebuilding trust and effective governance. The situation remains complex, with both setbacks and signs of hope as community members and officials navigate a difficult path forward[2][3][4].

Thus, the claim reflects a critical social sentiment but does not fully align with the latest empirical crime data, which points to improvements rather than a complete collapse of safety or disregard for Black lives in Minneapolis.

Citations

Claim

Belter shot at Senator John Hoffman's home before proceeding to the homes of other legislators.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Vance Belter (also referred to as Vance Boelter in sources) shot at Senator John Hoffman's home before proceeding to the homes of other legislators is confirmed by multiple police reports and news coverage.

According to prosecutors and surveillance evidence, Belter carefully planned his attack on multiple Minnesota Democratic state lawmakers and their families. He disguised himself as a police officer and wore a hyperrealistic mask. His first known target was Senator John Hoffman's home, where Hoffman attempted to push Belter out and stop him from entering. Belter then shot Hoffman and his wife repeatedly, seriously wounding them both. After this, surveillance footage shows Belter ringing the doorbell of another lawmaker, indicating he proceeded to target other legislators as well[1][2].

Belter is charged with two counts of second-degree murder and two counts of second-degree attempted murder, having fatally shot Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, and seriously injured Senator Hoffman and his wife. Authorities also recovered a manifesto with names of 50 to 70 individuals and businesses, suggesting a broader planned attack[2][3][4].

Thus, the detail that Belter shot at Senator John Hoffman's home before targeting other legislators is well-documented and supported by police and media reports.

Citations

Claim

Belter was wearing a latex mask and pretending to be a police officer during the attacks.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Vance Belter was wearing a latex mask and pretending to be a police officer during the attacks is supported by law enforcement reports from the incident. According to authorities, Belter disguised himself as a police officer and wore a hyperrealistic mask when he carried out the shootings of Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses. Surveillance footage and police accounts indicate that he used this disguise to gain access and approach his victims, starting with Senator John Hoffman's home, where he shot Hoffman and his wife after Hoffman tried to prevent him from entering[1][4].

Belter's actions were part of a carefully planned attack targeting multiple Democratic state lawmakers and their families. He researched his victims extensively and used the police disguise as part of his method to carry out the shootings[1][4]. This corroborates the claim that he was wearing a latex mask and impersonating law enforcement during the attacks.

Thus, the claim is accurate and substantiated by official law enforcement statements and court proceedings related to the case.

Citations

Claim

Vance Belter had a handwritten 'hit list' containing the names of over 60 lawmakers and abortion clinics.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Vance Belter (correctly spelled Vance Boelter) had a handwritten "hit list" containing the names of over 60 lawmakers and abortion clinics is supported by multiple reports based on law enforcement findings.

– Vance Luther Boelter, the suspect in the Minnesota shootings that killed Democratic lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, was found to have a "hit list" in his possession with over 70 names. This list included abortion providers, abortion rights activists, and pro-choice politicians in Minnesota and other states[2].

– The list was reportedly found in a series of notebooks at Boelter’s home, chilling abortion providers and activists in the region[3]. The names on the list were connected to reproductive health care providers and organizations, reflecting Boelter’s anti-abortion motivations[1][3].

– Boelter’s motives appear linked to his strong opposition to abortion, as evidenced by his sermons and the contents of the list[2]. The list and related materials were obtained from law enforcement records during the investigation[1][3].

Therefore, the existence of a handwritten hit list with the names of over 60 lawmakers and abortion clinics attributed to Vance Boelter is verified by law enforcement sources and multiple news reports.

Citations

Claim

Belter claimed in a confession letter that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz made him commit the murders in order to kill Senator Amy Klobuchar.

Veracity Rating: 1 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluation of the Claim

The claim that Vance Boelter (also referred to as Belter) asserted in a confession letter that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz made him commit the murders to kill Senator Amy Klobuchar can be evaluated based on available information.

### Evidence and Context

1. **Letter to the FBI**: According to reports, Vance Boelter did write a letter to the FBI claiming that Governor Tim Walz asked him to assassinate Senator Amy Klobuchar. This letter is described as rambling and difficult to read, and it also includes claims of being secretly trained by the U.S. Military[5].

2. **Legal Proceedings and Charges**: Boelter is charged with federal murder, stalking, and firearm offenses related to the killing of state House Democratic Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband, as well as the wounding of state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife[1][3]. There is no mention in these charges or reports of any involvement by Governor Walz.

3. **Investigation and Arrest**: Boelter was arrested after an extensive manhunt and is facing both federal and state charges for the murders and attempted murders[4]. The investigation highlighted that Boelter impersonated a police officer and had a list of targets, but there is no indication that Governor Walz was involved in these actions[4].

### Conclusion

While Boelter did claim in a letter that Governor Walz asked him to assassinate Senator Amy Klobuchar, this assertion lacks credible evidence and is not supported by the ongoing legal proceedings or investigations. The letter's content is described as rambling and includes unsubstantiated claims, which raises questions about its reliability[5]. Therefore, the claim appears to be unsubstantiated and lacks concrete evidence to support its validity.

### Recommendations for Further Verification

– **Examine the Letter Directly**: To verify the claim, it would be necessary to examine the letter itself and assess its credibility based on handwriting analysis, content coherence, and any corroborating evidence.
– **Investigative Findings**: Law enforcement and investigative reports should be reviewed for any evidence linking Governor Walz to Boelter's actions.
– **Legal Proceedings**: Monitor the legal proceedings to see if any evidence supporting Boelter's claims is presented in court.

Citations

Claim

Belter served on a workforce development board that was appointed by Governor Walz and previously by Governor Dayton.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that Vance Boelter served on a workforce development board appointed by Governor Tim Walz and previously by Governor Mark Dayton is supported by multiple official and media sources.

– Vance Boelter was appointed by Governor Tim Walz to the Minnesota Governor’s Workforce Development Board for a four-year term starting December 14, 2019, through January 2, 2023. This appointment is confirmed by an appointment letter from Governor Walz and official press releases listing Boelter as a business member of the board[2][5].

– Additionally, government records show that Boelter was appointed to the Governor's Workforce Development Council effective June 29, 2016, with a term expiring June 30, 2019, which corresponds to the period when Governor Mark Dayton was in office. This indicates Boelter’s service on a workforce development board under Dayton as well[3].

– Further confirmation comes from news reports noting Boelter’s involvement with workforce development boards since 2013, including chairing a county board related to workforce development[1][4].

In summary, Vance Boelter served on Minnesota workforce development boards appointed by both Governor Mark Dayton and Governor Tim Walz, as verified by government appointment records and official announcements.

Citations

Claim

There are questions about where the money is coming from.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that "there are questions about where the money is coming from" in relation to Vance Boelter, the individual accused of assassinating two Minnesota Democratic lawmakers, is supported by some details about his financial situation that raise potential inconsistencies warranting investigation.

According to court records, Vance Boelter, 57, stated he earned $540 a week from a part-time job, had paid off his home, held between $20,000 and $30,000 in bank accounts, and owned seven vehicles registered in his name[1]. This financial profile appears somewhat unusual given the modest income reported alongside significant assets like multiple vehicles and a paid-off home. Such a discrepancy naturally leads to questions about the sources of his funds and whether there might be undisclosed income or financial support.

This financial inconsistency aligns with the broader context of the aftermath of George Floyd's death and the political and social upheaval in Minnesota, where escalating violence and political tensions have been prominent[1][3]. The discussion around Boelter’s actions and background includes scrutiny of his motives and resources, which could include a deeper look into his finances to understand how he was able to prepare and carry out the attack.

In summary, the available information about Boelter’s financial situation—modest income but substantial assets—does raise legitimate questions about the origins of his money, suggesting that an investigation into his finances would be appropriate to clarify these inconsistencies[1].

Citations

Claim

Law enforcement seems to think that he'd been plotting something for a long time.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluating the Claim: Law Enforcement's Perspective on Vance Boelter's Intentions

The claim suggests that law enforcement believes Vance Boelter had been plotting something for a long time. To assess the validity of this claim, we need to examine available evidence and statements from law enforcement regarding Boelter's actions and intentions.

### Evidence and Reports

1. **Investigative Findings**: Vance Boelter, the suspect in the assassination of Minnesota state lawmakers, allegedly posed as a police officer during the attack. Authorities have reported that a manifesto was recovered, which included a list of targets, suggesting premeditation and planning[3]. This evidence supports the notion that Boelter had been planning his actions.

2. **Manifesto and Target List**: The presence of a manifesto with a list of 50 to 70 individuals and businesses, including Planned Parenthood locations, indicates that Boelter had a clear set of targets in mind. This level of detail suggests a level of planning and intent that aligns with the claim that law enforcement views his actions as premeditated[3].

3. **Law Enforcement Statements**: While specific statements from law enforcement about their belief in Boelter's long-term planning are not directly cited, the recovery of a manifesto and the nature of the attack imply a level of premeditation that would likely be interpreted by law enforcement as evidence of long-term planning.

### Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, it appears that law enforcement's investigation has uncovered elements that suggest Boelter had been planning his actions for some time. The presence of a manifesto and the impersonation of a police officer during the attack support the idea that Boelter's actions were premeditated. Therefore, the claim that law enforcement believes Boelter had been plotting something for a long time is supported by the evidence of premeditation in his actions.

### Additional Considerations

– **Entrapment Defense**: The claim does not involve an entrapment defense, as there is no indication that law enforcement induced Boelter to commit the crime. Entrapment would require evidence that law enforcement initiated or pressured Boelter into committing the crime, which is not relevant to this scenario[5].

– **Societal Context**: The incident occurs within a broader societal context of increased violence and political tension, which may influence how law enforcement views such crimes. However, the specific claim about Boelter's intentions is supported by the evidence of premeditation rather than societal factors.

Citations

Claim

Protests occurred in connection to George Floyd's death, with around five or six deaths reported during the riots.

Veracity Rating: 1 out of 4

Facts

The claim that protests occurred in connection to George Floyd's death, with around five or six deaths reported during the riots, is supported but requires clarification and expansion based on available data.

**Protests and Deaths During the George Floyd Unrest**

– Following George Floyd's murder on May 25, 2020, widespread protests erupted across Minneapolis and many other U.S. cities, continuing through 2020 and into 2021. These protests were largely peaceful, but some escalated into riots involving violence, looting, and clashes with police[1].

– Regarding fatalities, the number of deaths linked to the unrest is higher than five or six. By June 8, 2020, an informal tally reported at least 17 deaths associated with incidents stemming from the protests and unrest nationwide[3]. These deaths included various circumstances such as shootings during looting, confrontations, and other violent incidents.

– The City of Minneapolis and other authorities documented the timeline and events of the unrest, noting significant property damage and public safety challenges but did not limit the death toll to a handful[4][5].

**Summary**

– The protests following George Floyd's death were a major national and global movement for racial justice, with the majority of demonstrations being peaceful[1][2].

– However, the unrest also involved violent episodes resulting in multiple deaths—at least 17 reported by early June 2020—exceeding the "five or six" figure mentioned in the claim[3].

– The aftermath in Minnesota has been complex, involving political and social changes under Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison, with ongoing debates about law enforcement, crime, and community safety[summary].

In conclusion, while protests did occur in connection with George Floyd's death, the number of deaths during the related unrest is significantly higher than five or six, with at least 17 deaths reported in various incidents linked to the protests and riots[3].

Citations

Claim

George Floyd's family received a settlement of 27 million dollars during Derek Chauvin's jury selection.

Veracity Rating: 1 out of 4

Facts

The claim that George Floyd's family received a $27 million settlement during Derek Chauvin's jury selection is not accurate in terms of timing, but the amount and fact of the settlement are correct.

The City of Minneapolis unanimously approved a $27 million settlement with George Floyd's family in March 2021, which is one of the largest pre-trial settlements in a civil rights wrongful death lawsuit in the U.S.[3][5]. This settlement was related to the wrongful death lawsuit filed against the city and the officers involved, including Derek Chauvin. The settlement was publicly announced and approved well before Derek Chauvin's trial and jury selection process, which began later in 2021.

The $27 million settlement was a significant financial resolution to the civil case, separate from the criminal trial of Derek Chauvin, who was convicted of murder and manslaughter charges related to Floyd's death[4]. The settlement was intended to provide some measure of justice and support to Floyd's family, though family members expressed that no amount of money could compensate for their loss[3].

In summary, while George Floyd's family did receive a $27 million settlement related to his death, this settlement was approved by the Minneapolis City Council months before Derek Chauvin's jury selection, not during it[3][5].

Citations

Claim

There has been skyrocketing crime since the protests and riots following George Floyd's death.

Veracity Rating: 1 out of 4

Facts

The claim that there has been skyrocketing crime since the protests and riots following George Floyd's death is not fully supported by recent crime data from Minneapolis and Minnesota.

**Crime Trends in Minneapolis Since George Floyd's Death**

– Crime in Minneapolis, including violent crime, did increase in the years following George Floyd's death in 2020, with a surge in homicides and other violent offenses noted through 2023 and 2024. For example, Minneapolis saw 76 homicides in 2024, slightly more than in 2023, and other crime metrics also rose slightly that year[4].

– However, this increase in violence began before the pandemic and Floyd's death, with violence surging since 2018, indicating that the rise in crime is not solely attributable to the protests and riots[4].

– Importantly, in early 2025, Minneapolis has experienced a significant decrease in crime rates. Data from the first few months of 2025 show a 32% reduction in gunshot wound victims, a 24% reduction in auto thefts, and an 18.1% reduction in other crime categories[2].

– City leaders have reported a "promising decline" in shootings and homicides in early 2025, with fewer homicides, nearly half as many robberies, and an 11% drop in aggravated assaults compared to the same period in 2024[3][4].

– Despite these improvements, officials acknowledge that the Minneapolis Police Department remains understaffed and that violence prevention efforts are still evolving[4].

**Broader Context**

– Minnesota crime statistics from law enforcement agencies provide comprehensive data on various crime categories, including violent and property crimes, arrests, and law enforcement-related incidents, which can be used to assess trends over time[5].

– The narrative of "skyrocketing crime" since Floyd's death is complicated by multiple factors, including pre-existing crime trends, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in policing and community programs, and political and social dynamics in Minnesota.

**Summary**

While there was an increase in crime in Minneapolis and Minnesota following George Floyd's death and the associated protests and riots, this rise was part of a broader trend that began before 2020. Recent data from early 2025 indicate a significant decrease in many major crime categories, suggesting that crime rates are not currently skyrocketing but are instead showing signs of improvement. Therefore, the claim of skyrocketing crime since the protests is an oversimplification and does not reflect the latest available data[2][3][4][5].

Citations

Claim

George Floyd spent most of his life in and out of prison.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

George Floyd did have a criminal history that included multiple arrests and convictions, but the characterization that he "spent most of his life in and out of prison" is an exaggeration and lacks nuance.

Between 1997 and 2005, Floyd was arrested several times on drug and theft charges and spent some months in jail. In 2007, he was charged with aggravated robbery involving a gun and pleaded guilty in 2009, receiving a five-year prison sentence, for which he served about four years before being paroled in 2013[1][2][4]. Aside from this, he had other convictions in Texas, including felony robbery with a deadly weapon and theft, but these were concentrated in a period roughly spanning a decade[4].

After his release on parole in 2013, Floyd moved to the Minneapolis area around 2014, where he sought a fresh start. He worked as a truck driver, security guard, and bouncer, and was involved in his religious community as a mentor posting anti-violence messages[1][2]. There is no indication that he spent significant time in prison after 2013.

In summary, while Floyd had a criminal record earlier in his adult life, including a notable prison term from 2009 to 2013, it is inaccurate to say he spent most of his life in and out of prison. His later years were marked by efforts to rebuild his life and community involvement[1][2][4].

Citations

Claim

He was convicted of armed robbery where he stuck a gun in the belly of a pregnant woman.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

The claim that George Floyd was convicted of armed robbery involving sticking a gun in the belly of a pregnant woman is partially accurate but contains inaccuracies regarding the details.

George Floyd was convicted in 2007 of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon during a home invasion in Houston, Texas. This conviction was part of a plea bargain for which he served four years in prison and was paroled in 2013[1][2]. The victim in this case was a woman named Aracely Henriquez, whom Floyd robbed at gunpoint[3]. However, there is no evidence in court documents or credible sources that the victim was pregnant at the time of the robbery, despite claims to that effect circulating in some media and social posts[3][4].

Floyd had a criminal history that included felony robbery with a deadly weapon, theft, and multiple drug-related offenses from 1997 to 2009 in Harris County, Texas. After moving to Minnesota in 2014, he had no serious criminal convictions[1][3][4].

In summary, George Floyd was convicted of an armed robbery involving a gun, but the specific detail that he "stuck a gun in the belly of a pregnant woman" is not supported by court records or verified reports. The victim was robbed at gunpoint, but her pregnancy status is unsubstantiated and appears to be a false addition to the narrative[3][4].

Citations

Claim

Governor Walz asked for all public schools kids to be silent for nine minutes and 29 seconds.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

Governor Tim Walz asked Minnesotans, including public schools, to observe a moment of silence lasting 9 minutes and 29 seconds to honor George Floyd on the one-year anniversary of his death, May 25, 2021. This was done through an official proclamation requesting the moment of silence at 1:00 p.m. that day, reflecting on the impact of Floyd’s murder and the ongoing need to address systemic racism and injustice[2][5].

It is important to note that the original moment of silence shortly after Floyd’s death in June 2020 was for 8 minutes and 46 seconds, the length of time Derek Chauvin knelt on Floyd’s neck[1]. The 9 minutes and 29 seconds duration was specifically for the one-year anniversary commemoration in 2021[2].

Therefore, the claim that Governor Walz asked for all public school kids to be silent for 9 minutes and 29 seconds is accurate in the context of the 2021 anniversary observance, which was a statewide call including schools and communities to reflect on George Floyd’s death and its significance[2][5].

Citations

We believe in transparency and accuracy. That’s why this blog post was verified with CheckForFacts.
Start your fact-checking journey today and help create a smarter, more informed future!